Ravi Shankar Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.7779 of 2022 ====================================================== Ravi Shankar Kumar, son of Ashok Kumar, Resident of MohallaKamruddinganj, P.s.-Bihar Sharif, District-Nalanda (Bihar). ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

The State of Bihar through Principal Secretary, Irrigation Department, Government of Bihar, Patna.

2.

The Principal Secretary to the Government, Water Resources Department, Govt. of Bihar, Patna.

3.

The Bihar Technical Service Commission through its Secretary, 19, Harding Road, Patna.

4.

The Chairman, Bihar Technical Service Commission through its Secretary, 19, Harding Road, Patna.

5.

The Deputy Secretary, Bihar Technical Service Commission through its Secretary, 19, Harding Road, Patna.

6.

Principal Secretary, Water Resources Department, Government of Bihar, Patna.

7.

The Principal Secretary, Planning and Development Department, Govt. of Bihar, Patna.

8.

The Principal Secretary, Urban Development and Housing Department, Govt. of Bihar, Patna.

9.

The Principal Secretary, Rural Work Department, Govt. of Bihar, Patna. 10.

The Principal Secretary, Public Health and Engineering Department, Govt. of Bihar, Patna.

11.

The Principal Secretary, Building Construction Department, Govt. of Bihar, Patna.

12.

The Principal Secretary, Road Construction Department, Govt. of Bihar, Patna.

13.

The Principal Secretary, Minor Water Resources Department, Govt. of Bihar, Patna.

... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Dinu Kumar, Advocate Ms. Ritika Rani, Advocate For the Respondent/s :

Mr. P.K. Shahi, Advocate General Mr. Pawan Kumar (A.C. To A.G.) ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE and HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE MADHURESH PRASAD ORAL ORDER

Patna High Court CWJC No.7779 of 2022(3) dt.13-04-2023 2/2 (Per: HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE) 13-04-2023 Learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Advocate General agree that the matter has become infructuous since a new Rule has been framed.

Learned counsel for the petitioner seeks for liberty to challenge the new Rule, which is definitely granted. With the liberty aforesaid, the writ petition is disposed of.

(K. Vinod Chandran, CJ) (Madhuresh Prasad, J) P.K.P./Anushka U