Viranjan Kumar @ Biranjan Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.26313 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-13 Year-2025 Thana- DHANGAI District- Gaya ====================================================== Viranjan Kumar @ Biranjan Kumar S/o Vyas Yadav @ Byas Yadav VillageKundil, PS- Barachatti, District- Gaya ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Devashish Giri, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Madhura Nand Jha, A.P.P.

====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SOURENDRA PANDEY ORAL ORDER 04-07-2025 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State.

2. The petitioner seeks regular bail in case registered for the offences punishable under Sections 317(5), 336 (3) and 338 of B.N.S.

3. As per the prosecution case, during vehicle check, the police intercepted one motorcycle and one persons was apprehended who disclosed his name as Vikranjan Kumar @ Biranjan Kumar (petitioner). On documents being demanded, it was found that the registration no., the engine no. and the chassis no. were not the same and it was found that the motorcycle actually belong to some other person who had earlier lodged an FIR for the theft of the same.

4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.26313 of 2025(3) dt.04-07-2025 2/3 petitioner has falsely been implicated and no such recovery as alleged in the FIR was made from his conscious possession. The learned counsel next submits that even the seizure list does not have any independent witness to such seizure and as such it defices the provisions of law. It has further been submitted that the petitioner is a student and has a bright career ahead and he carries clean antecedent and he in custody since 29.01.2025.

5. Learned A.P.P. for the State has vehemently opposed the prayer for bail and has stated that petitioner was found with stolen motorcycle.

6. Considering the aforesaid facts and taking into account the petitioner has clean antecedent, let the petitioner, above named, be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned court below where the case is pending/successor court in connection with Dhangai P.S. Case No. 13 of 2025 , subject to the following conditions:- (i) One of the bailors of the petitioner shall be his close relative and the other shall be local resident. (ii) The petitioner shall remain physically present in Court on each date of the trial.

(iii) In case of absence on two consecutive dates or in

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.26313 of 2025(3) dt.04-07-2025 3/3 violation of the terms of the bail, the bail bond of the petitioner will be liable to be cancelled by the court concerned. (iv) If the petitioner is found involved in similar nature of offence in future, the prosecution shall be at liberty to move for cancellation of his bail bond.

(v) The learned Court below shall verify the criminal antecedent of the petitioner and in case at any stage it is found that the petitioner has concealed his criminal antecedent, the court below shall take step for cancellation of bail bond of the petitioner. However, the acceptance of bail bonds in terms of the above-mentioned.

7. Accordingly, the prayer for bail is allowed. (Sourendra Pandey, J) Siwani/- U T