Md. Mujmil Haque v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.37846 of 2021 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-48 Year-2021 Thana- KORHA District- Katihar ====================================================== 1.

MD. MUJMIL HAQUE Son of Late Afran Ali R/O Village Baijnathpur Simariya, P.S. Korha, District Katihar.

2.

Md. Najrul Son of Late Afran Ali R/O Village Baijnathpur Simariya, P.S. Korha, District Katihar.

3.

Lokman Son of Late Jainul Abedin R/O Village Baijnathpur Simariya, P.S. Korha, District Katihar.

4.

Md. Mantu Son of Late Jainul Abedin R/O Village Baijnathpur Simariya, P.S. Korha, District Katihar.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

THE STATE OF BIHAR.

... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. N.K. Agrawal, Senior Advocate Mr. Binod Kumar Sinha, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Sanjay Kumar Singh Mr. Bhola Prasad Mr. Indrajeet Kumar ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANJANI KUMAR SHARAN ORAL ORDER 26-07-2022 Heard Mr. N.K. Agrawal, learned Senior Counsel assisted by Mr. Binod Kumar Sinha for the petitioners and the learned APP for the State.

Petitioners apprehend their arrest in Korha P.S. Case No.48 of 2021, registered for the offences punishable under Sections 341, 323, 307, 504, 506 and 34 of the Indian Penal Code.

The petitioners are said to have assaulted the nephews of the informant by means of iron rod causing injuries to them.

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.37846 of 2021(4) dt.26-07-2022 2/2 Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the petitioners are innocent and have falsely been implicated in the present case. Both sides are co-relatives and neighbour. It is further submitted that both sides are supporters of different political parties that is why the petitioners have falsely been implicated in the present case. The informant sides also assaulted the petitioners for which Korha P.S. Case No.49 of 2021 was lodged.

Learned APP for the State opposes the prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioners and submits that the injuries are grievous in nature.

Considering the fact that the injuries are grievous in nature, I am not inclined to enlarge the petitioners on anticipatory bail. Accordingly, the prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioners is rejected.

(Anjani Kumar Sharan, J.) Sanjay/- U T