Satish Kumar Srivastava v. The Union Of India And ORS

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.1864 of 2015 ====================================================== Satish Kumar Srivastava Son of Mangala Lal Resident of VillageKarnapura, Durgwati, District- Kaimur. .... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The Union of India through the Secretary Ministry of Road and Transport and Surface, Government of India, New Delhi.

2. The Secretary, Ministry of Road Transport and Highway Government of India, New Delhi.

3. The Chief Engineer, National Highway N.H.2 Patna

4. The District Collector, Kaimur.

5. The District and Acquisition Officer, Kaimur.

6. National Highway Authority, N.H.2, Kaimur. .... .... Respondent/s ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE KISHORE KUMAR MANDAL ORAL ORDER 16-02-2015 Nobody appears on behalf of the petitioner to press this application.

Counsel for the State is present.

The case was called out on 03.02.2015 when the following order was passed:- "No one appears on behalf of the petitioner.

A.C. to A.G. for the State is present.

It is pointed out by counsel for the State that the award passed by the Arbitrator is under challenge in this proceeding. In the submission of the counsel for the State the award can be effectively challenged before the Civil Court in accordance with the provisions contained in the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

Post this application after ten days in the same list."

Patna High Court CWJC No.1864 of 2015 (3) dt.16-02-2015 2 / 2 Continued non appearance of the petitioner depicts that the petitioner has lost interest in pursuing the present proceeding.

The writ application is dismissed for want of prosecution.

(Kishore Kumar Mandal, J) HR/- U