Harinarayan Singh And ORS v. State Of Bihar And ANR
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Criminal Miscellaneous No.51025 of 2017 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -1242 Year- 2016 Thana -BHABHU(KAIMUR) COMPLAIN C District- BHABHUA (KAIMUR) ======================================================
1. Harinarayan Singh
2. Mukesh Singh
3. Rajesh Singh .... .... Petitioner/s
Versus
State of Bihar & Anr .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Rajani Kant Pandey For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Sri Nand Kishore Pd ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY PRIYA ORAL ORDER 18-10-2017 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and the State. The petitioners apprehend arrest in Complaint Case No. 1242 of 2016 instituted for the offence under Section-379 & other minor Sections of the Indian Penal Code.
As per written report, petitioners cut away the crops from the land of the complainant.
Counsel for the petitioners has submitted that Title Suit bearing T.S. No. 287 of 2016 is pending between the parties. From the written report, it appears that there is general and omnibus allegation against the petitioners.
In such circumstances, prayer for anticipatory bail is allowed and it is ordered that the petitioners named above in the event of their arrest or surrender in the court below within six weeks from the date of receipt/production of copy of this order, shall be released on
Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.51025 of 2017 (2) dt.18-10-2017 2/2 bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each in connection with in Complaint Case No. 1242 of 2016 to the satisfaction of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Kaimur at Bhabua subject to condition as laid down u/S 438(2) of the Cr.P.C. with further conditions (1) bailors should be local having sufficient immovable property within the jurisdiction of the court concerned, (2) petitioners shall cooperate in the trial and shall be present on each and every date fixed by the court and absence on two consecutive dates without proper and reasonable reason, will automatically cancel bail bond of the petitioners and (3) if petitioners tamper with the evidence or the witnesses of the case, in that case, prosecution will be at liberty to move for cancellation of bail of the petitioners.
(Sanjay Priya, J) A.K.V./- U T