← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./29063/2022bail granted

Bablu @ Guddu Kumar @ Bablu Kumar @ Guddu Yadav v. The State Of Bihar

2022-11-28Mr. Justice Prabhat Kumar Singh2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.29063 of 2022 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-146 Year-2019 Thana- MADANPUR District- Aurangabad ====================================================== BABLU @ GUDDU KUMAR @ BABLU KUMAR @ GUDDU YADAV Son of Narsingh Yadav Resident of Village - Gouspur, P.S. - Madanpur, District - Aurangabad.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Sanjay Kumar For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Ajay Kumar Jha ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRABHAT KUMAR SINGH ORAL ORDER 28-11-2022 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State. Petitioner apprehends his arrest in a case registered for the offence punishable under Section 307, 325, 379 and some other ancillary Sections of the Indian Penal Code. As per the prosecution case, this petitioner along with other FIR named accused persons attacked upon the informant and his brother as they refused to compromise the case earlier filed by them. The accused persons assaulted them with Lathi and iron rod as a result of which they sustained multiple injuries. It is further alleged that when Ramnandan Yadav and Mukesh Kumar came to save they were also assaulted by the accused persons. The accused persons also took away mobile phones, golden ring and Rs. 15,000/- from them.

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.29063 of 2022(4) dt.28-11-2022 2/2 Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that petitioner is innocent and has falsely been implicated in the case due to previous enmity. The allegation of assault is general and omnibus. It is further submitted that though there is allegation of assault against all the accused persons but there is no injury report on record. Petitioner has got clean antecedent. Learned counsel appearing for the State opposes the prayer for anticipatory bail.

Considering the facts of the case, nature of accusation and clean antecedent of the petitioner, let the petitioner, above named, in the event of his arrest/ surrender within a period of six weeks from today shall be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Chief Judicial Magistrate, Aurangabad in connection with Madanpur PS case No. 146/ 2019, subject to conditions laid down u/s 438(2) of the Cr. P. C. (Prabhat Kumar Singh, J) BKS/- U T