Sujeet Rai @ Ram Suchit Singh And ANR v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Criminal Miscellaneous No.3104 of 2018 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-310 Year-2017 Thana- RUPASPUR District- Patna ======================================================
1. Sujeet Rai @ Ram Suchit Singh, Son of Late Sanfi Ray, aged about 61 years.
2. Doulat Devi @ Doulati Devi, Wife of Sujeet Rai @ Sujeet Kumar Rai, aged 55 years, Both residents of I.A.S. Colony, P.S.- Rupaspur, District- Patna.
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar.
... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Dr. Satyendra Kumar Srivastava For the Opposite Party/s :
Mr. MANOJ KUMAR ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUDHIR SINGH ORAL ORDER 17-01-2018 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned APP for the State.
The petitioners are apprehending their arrest in a case registered under Sections 341, 323, 504, 498A/34 of the Indian Penal Code and 3⁄4 of Dowry Prohibition Act.
Allegation against the petitioners is of committing torture upon the victim due to non-fulfilment of demand of dowry. It has been submitted on behalf of the petitioners that the petitioners have got no criminal antecedent. There is no allegation of tampering of witnesses alleged against the petitioners. The petitioners have falsely been implicated in the present case. The case is triable by the Magistrate. The
Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.3104 of 2018(2) dt.17-01-2018 2/2 petitioners have relied upon the judgment of this Court in the case of Md. Naimul Haque Ansari @ Naimul Haque Ansari & Ors. Vs. The State of Bihar, reported in 2006(3) PLJR 182. On behalf of the State, it is submitted that the petitioners are named in the F.I.R.
Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances, let the petitioners, above named, in the event of arrest/surrender before the learned court below within a period of six weeks from today, be released on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.10,000/- (Ten thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned A.C.J.M. II, Danapur, District Patna in connection with Rupaspur P.S. case No.310 of 2017, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure.
(Sudhir Singh, J) Narendra/- U T