← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./47902/2016rejected

Dabbu Singh @ Dablu Singh And ANR v. The State Of Bihar

2016-12-07Mr. Justice Kishore K. Mandal2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.47902 of 2016 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -846 Year- 2015 Thana -BIHTA District- PATNA ======================================================

1. Dabbu Singh @ Dablu Singh, son of Late Satya Narayan Singh

2. Manish Singh @ Manish Kumar, son of Birendra Kumar Singh Both residents of village Vishnupura, P.S.- Bihta, District- Patna. .... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Jai Prakash Verma For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. M. Dayal, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE KISHORE KUMAR MANDAL ORAL ORDER 07-12-2016 Heard Mr. Verma for the petitioners and Mr. Dayal, APP for the State.

Petitioners pray for anticipatory bail in Bihta P.S. Case No. 846 of 2015 registered under sections 147, 148, 149, 341, 323, 324 and 307 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 27 of the Arms Act. In substance, the allegation is that the accused persons came and started abusing the informant. Subsequently, the petitioner no. 1 hurled out threats and as the informant proceeded further, it is alleged that petitioner no. 1 and others forced him down from motorcycle and started assaulting. Petitioner no. 2 also arrived with lathi and contributed in assault.

Contention of the petitioners is that no specific allegation of assault is attributed to the petitioners. Allegations are general and omnibus. The injuries sustained by the informant are not

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.47902 of 2016 (2) dt.07-12-2016 2/2 serious/grave.

Learned APP, on the other hand, submits that the informant received injuries on the vital parts which corroborate the prosecution case. Some witnesses, in course of investigation, have supported the case.

In my view, it is not a fit case for grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioners. Prayer is rejected.

(Kishore Kumar Mandal, J) Pankaj/- U T