Pawan Kumar v. State Of Bihar And ANR
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Criminal Revision No.43 of 2017 ======================================================
1. Pawan Kumar S/o Late Shyamkishore Pandit resident of Mohalla - Talipokhar, Jaiprakash Nagar, P.S. - Aurangabad. .... .... Petitioner
Versus
1. The State Of Bihar
2. Anjali Rani D/o Naresh Prasad and W/o Pawan Kumar. resident in the house of Praveen Kumar, Mohalla - Gondapur, P.S.- Nawada, Dist-Nawada. .... .... Respondents ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner : Mr. Jitendra Kumar Pandey For the State : Mr. Arun Kumar Pandey For O. P. No. 2 : Ms. Anjali Rani (in person) ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE CHAKRADHARI SHARAN SINGH ORAL ORDER 02-05-2017 Heard learned Counsel for the petitioner and learned Additional Public Prosecutor, representing the State. Also heard the Opposite Party No. 2, in person. The petitioner is aggrieved by an order, dated 22.08.2016, passed, in Matrimonial Case No. 49 of 2015, by learned Principal Judge, Family Court, Nawada, whereby learned Court below has allowed interim maintenance at the rate of Rs. 10,000/- per month and litigation cost @ Rs. 1,000/- per month.
This application has been filed under Section 19
(4) of the Family Courts Act, 1984.
In my view, the order being interim in nature,
Patna High Court CR. REV. No.43 of 2017 (5) dt.02-05-2017 2/2 this criminal revision application cannot be maintained. This application stands dismissed as not maintainable.
(Chakradhari Sharan Singh, J.) Prabhakar Anand/- U √ T √