Sri Prakash Yadav @ Shio Prakash Yadav v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.38004 of 2021 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-209 Year-2020 Thana- BHABHU(KAIMUR) COMPLAIN C District- Kaimur (Bhabua) ====================================================== SRI PRAKASH YADAV @ SHIO PRAKASH YADAV S/o Bharat Yadav Resident of Village- Chor Lohra, P.S.- Chainpur, District- Kaimuar (Bhabua) ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
1.
The State of Bihar Bihar 2.
Moti Devi W/o Sri Prakash Yadav @ Shio Prakash Yadav Resident of Village- Chor Lohra, P.S.- Chainpur, District- Kaimur (Bhabua), At present R/o Udayrampur, P.S.- Chainpur, District- Kaimur (Bihar). ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr.Raju Kumar For the Opposite Party/s :
Mr.Anand Kishore Chaudhary, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUDHIR SINGH ORAL ORDER 11-08-2021 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State through virtual mode.
Learned counsel for the petitioner is directed to remove the defects, as pointed out by the Office, within a period of four weeks after restoration of normalcy.
The petitioner is apprehending his arrest in Complaint Case No. 209/2020 in which cognizance has been taken under Section 498A of the Indian Penal Code.
Allegation against the petitioner is of committing torture upon the victim due to non-fulfillment of demand of dowry.
It has been submitted on behalf of the petitioner that
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.38004 of 2021(2) dt.11-08-2021 2/3 the petitioner has got no criminal antecedent. There is no allegation of tampering of witnesses alleged against the petitioner. The petitioner has falsely been implicated in the present case due to petty family dispute. The case is triable by the Magistrate. The petitioner has relied upon the judgment of this Court in the case of Md. Naimul Haque Ansari @ Naimul Haque Ansari & Ors. Vs. The State of Bihar, reported in 2006(3) PLJR 182.
On behalf of the State, it is submitted that the petitioner is named in the Complaint Case/F.I.R. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances, the petitioner, above named, in the event of arrest/surrender before the learned court below within a period of twelve weeks from today, be released on anticipatory bail on his personal bond to the satisfaction of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Kaimur at Bhabua in connection with Complaint Case No. 209 of 2020, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure.
Once the normalcy is restored, the petitioner shall furnish bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/- (Rupees ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each within a period of eight weeks to the satisfaction of the Court concerned in connection
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.38004 of 2021(2) dt.11-08-2021 3/3 with the aforesaid case.
If so advised, either of the parties will be at liberty to make an application before the Court below for referring the matter to the District Mediation Centre for the purpose of reconciliation or one time settlement.
(Sudhir Singh, J) Pankaj/- U T