← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./24729/2018bail granted

Kundan Kumar Jha @ Sonu v. State Of Bihar And ANR

2018-04-24Mr. Justice Sudhir Singh2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.24729 of 2018 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-353 Year-2017 Thana- MADHUBANI COMPLAINT CASE District- Madhubani ====================================================== Kundan Kumar Jha @ Sonu son of Late Bijendra Jha Resident of Mahrail, P.S. - Rudrapur, District - Madhubani.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar.

2. Madhu Jha wife of Kundan Kumar Jha @ Sonu, Daughter of Madnanand Jha at present residing at Village - Ranti, P.S. - Rajnagar, District - Madhubani. ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Kripa Nand Jha , Mr. Anjani Kumar Jha For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Ajay Kumar-1 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUDHIR SINGH ORAL ORDER 24-04-2018 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, learned APP for the State and learned counsel for the opposite party No. 2. The petitioner is apprehending his arrest in a case in which cognizance has been taken under sections 323 and 498A of the Indian Penal Code and 3⁄4 of Dowry Prohibition Act. Allegation against the petitioner is of committing torture upon the victim due to non-fulfilment of demand of dowry.

It has been submitted on behalf of the petitioner that the petitioner has got no criminal antecedent. There is no allegation of tampering of witnesses alleged against the petitioner. The petitioner has falsely been implicated in the

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.24729 of 2018(2) dt.24-04-2018 2/2 present case due to petty family dispute. The case is triable by the Magistrate. The petitioner has relied upon the judgment of this Court in the case of Md. Naimul Haque Ansari @ Naimul Haque Ansari & Ors. Vs. The State of Bihar, reported in 2006(3) PLJR 182.

On behalf of the State, it is submitted that the petitioner is named in the Complaint Case/F.I.R. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances, let the petitioner, above named, in the event of arrest/surrender before the learned court below within a period of six weeks from today, be released on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.10,000/- (Ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned S.D.J.M., Madhubani in connection with Complaint Case No. 353/2017, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure.

(Sudhir Singh, J) Pankaj/- U T