Budhlal @Boudhu Das @ Budhlal Das @ Budhlal Kumar@Baudhu Das v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.28094 of 2022 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-281 Year-2020 Thana- WAJIRGANJ District- Gaya ====================================================== Budhlal @BOUDHU Das @ Budhlal Das @ Budhlal Kumar@Baudhu Das Son of Jalo Ravidas @ Jalo Ram Resident of Village - Dumrawan, P.S.- Wazirganj, Distt.- Gaya.

... ... Petitioner

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Vishwa Ranjan Choudhary, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Shailendra Kumar Singh, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV ROY ORAL ORDER 25-08-2022 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

Let the defect(s), if any, as pointed out by the office, be removed within four weeks.

The case is registered under sections 448, 341, 323, 354(B) of the Indian Penal Code & 8 of POCSO Act in connection with Wazirganj P.S. Case No. 281 of 2020. As per the allegation in the FIR, the petitioner entered the house of the informant, tried to abuse her and also dragged her out. When this was protested by her mother, she was also assaulted with brick causing injury. The further allegation of assault of the informant was there. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that he

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.28094 of 2022(2) dt.25-08-2022 2/2 is innocent and has falsely been in this case and the girl also wants to marry him.

On the other hand, the learned APP submits that there is specific allegation against him of barging into the house of the informant and tried to drag her out and upon protest, the mother was also assaulted. It seems that the trial has started in this case.

Considering the fact that there is specific allegation against the petitioner in the FIR and the trial has started, this Court is not inclined to grant him the privilege of bail which is rejected.

The Trial court is directed to expedite the trial and take the same to its logical end preferably within a period of one year.

(Rajiv Roy, J) Ravi/- U T