Ramchandra Jha v. The State Of Bihar Through The Principal Secretary

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Miscellaneous Jurisdiction Case No.1324 of 2024 In Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.10159 of 2022 ====================================================== Ramchandra Jha, son of Late Jay Nath Jha, resident of village Sarso (sic) Sarisab, P.S. Sarisab-pahi, District Madhubani. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

The State of Bihar through the Principal Secretary Higher Education, Govt. of Bihar, Patna, namely, Sri K.K. Pathak 2.

The Kameshwar Singh Darbhanga Sanskrit University, Kameshwar Nagar, Darbhanga through its Registrar, namely, Sri Dinanath Sah. 3.

Sri Lakshmi Nath Pandey, son of name not known to the petitioner, at present Vice Chancellor, Kameshwar Singh Darbhanga Sanskrit University, Kameshwar Nagar, Darbhanga.

4.

Sri Dinanth Sah, son of name not known to the petitioner, at present Registrar, Kameshwar Singh Darbhanga Sanskrit University, Kameshwar Nagar, Darbhanga (herein after referred to as K.S.D.S.U., Darbhanga). 5.

Sri Jaikishore Chaudhary, son of name not known to the petitioner, at present Finanace Officer, K.S.D.S., University, Kameshwar Nagar, Darbhanga. 6.

Sri Satish Chandra Jha, son of name not known to the petitioner, at present Principal, Laxmiwati Sanskrit College, Sarisab-pahi, District Madhubani. ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Kripa Nand Jha, Adv.

For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Standing Counsel 28 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE HARISH KUMAR ORAL ORDER 01-08-2025 Heard the parties.

2. In compliance with the order of this Court under contempt, a supplementary show-cause affidavit has been filed showing compliance of the order of this Court.

3. Learned Advocate for the petitioner however submits that it is not in dispute that substantial compliance has been made, however,

Patna High Court MJC No.1324 of 2024(6) dt.01-08-2025 2/2 there is some mis-calculation, apart from the petitioner has not been extended the benefit of A.C.P./M.A.C.P..

4. Considering the order under contempt and the submissions set forth, the present contempt petition stands disposed off with a liberty to the petitioner to approach before the authorities concerned for remaining grievance/dues before the concerned respondent.

5. The contempt petition stands disposed off with the aforesaid liberty.

(Harish Kumar, J) supratim/- U