Prem Singh v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.6907 of 2023 ====================================================== 1.

Prem Singh Son of Late Vishnu Deo Singh, Resident of Mohalla - Alkapuri (Damariya), P.S. - Gardanibagh, District - Patna 800002. The Chairman of Nav Yuvak Durga Puja Samiti Road No. 10 Gardanibagh, Patna. 2.

Pramod Kumar Singh, Son of Late Saukhi Prasad Singh, Resident of Mohalla-Gardanibagh, Road no. 10, Panch Mandir Talab, P.S. - Gardanibagh, district - Patna. The Secretary Nav Yuvak Chatth Puja Samiti Gardanibagh, Road no. 10, Panch Mandir, Talab, Patna. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

The State of Bihar through the Chief Secretary, Government of Bihar, Patna. 2.

The District Magistrate, Patna.

3.

The Senior Superintendent of Police, Patna.

4.

The Sub-Divisional Officer, Sadar, Patna.

5.

The Circle Officer, Sadar, Patna.

6.

The Station House Officer, Gardanibagh, Police Station, Patna. 7.

The Executive Engineer, Building Division, Gulzarbagh, Patna. 8.

The Assistant Engineer Gardanibagh, Building Sub-Division, Patna. 9.

That Bihar State Sunni Wakf Board through its Chief Executive Officer, Haj Bhawan 34, Harding Road, Ali Imam Path, P.S. Sachivalaya, Patna - 800001.

10.

Md. Sadruddin, Son of Late Md. Ishaque R/o - Village - Damaria, P.O. - Anisabad, P.S. - Gardanibagh, District - Patna - 800002, District - Patna. ... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Rajesh Kumar, Advocate For the Respondent/s :

Mr.Rishi Raj Sinha, S.C.-19 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH KUMAR VERMA ORAL ORDER 29-04-2024 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners, learned counsel appearing for respondent No.9 and learned counsel for the State.

After some arguments, learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission to withdraw this writ application

Patna High Court CWJC No.6907 of 2023(4) dt.29-04-2024 2/2 with liberty to file a revision application in light of the judgment reported in 2018(3)PLJR 222 which suggests that only Civil Revision Application shall lie against the order, which is impugned in the present writ application, before this Court. Permission is accorded.

Accordingly, this writ application stands dismissed as withdrawn with aforesaid liberty.

(Rajesh Kumar Verma, J) Nitesh/- U