Umesh Yadav v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.50534 of 2017 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -58 Year- 2017 Thana -KAKO District- JEHANABAD ====================================================== Umesh Yadav, Son of Ramanand Yadav, Resident of village Chandaura, P.S.- Kako, District- Jehanabad.

.... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Ajay Kumar Sinha, Advocate. For the Opposite Party/s : Smt. Renuka Ratnakar, A.P.P. ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY PRIYA ORAL ORDER 03-11-2017 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State. The petitioner apprehends his arrest in Kako P.S. Case No. 58 of 2017 instituted for the offence under Sections 147, 148, 341, 323 and 307 of the Indian Penal Code.

It has been submitted on behalf of the petitioner that he assaulted the informant on his eye brow with butt of the pistol. The learned Sessions Judge has mentioned in the impugned order that aforesaid injury was found to be simple in nature.

Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioner is allowed. In the event of surrender/arrest of the petitioner, named above, within six weeks from today, in connection with Kako P.S. Case No. 58 of

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.50534 of 2017 (2) dt.03-11-2017 2/2 2017, he shall be released on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (Ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Sri Rakesh Kumar Rajak, Sub Judge-IV, Jehanabad, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438 (2) Cr. P.C. with further conditions (1) bailors should be local having sufficient immovable property within the jurisdiction of the court concerned, (2) petitioner shall cooperate in the trial and shall be present on each and every date fixed by the court and absence on two consecutive dates without proper and reasonable reason will automatically cancel bail bond of the petitioner and (3) if petitioner tampers with the evidence or the witnesses of the case, in that case, prosecution will be at liberty to move for cancellation of bail of the petitioner. (Sanjay Priya, J) S.Ali/- U T