Vikash Kumar v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.28690 of 2026 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-60 Year-2025 Thana- PARASBIGHA District- Jehanabad ====================================================== 1.
Vikash Kumar Son of Balindra Yadav @ Balindra Kumar Singh @ Balindra Singh Resident of village - Korma Milki, P.S.- Parasbigha, District - Jehanabad, Bihar.
2.
Dhiraj Kumar Son of Balindra Yadav @ Balindra Kumar Singh @ Balindra Singh Resident of village - Korma Milki, P.S.- Parasbigha, District - Jehanabad, Bihar.
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr. Nalin Kumar, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :
Mr. Rajendra Singh, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH KUMAR VERMA ORAL ORDER 08-05-2026 Heard Mr. Nalin Kumar, learned counsel for the petitioners and Mr. Rajendra Singh, learned APP for the State.
2. The petitioners are apprehending their arrest in connection with Parasbigha P.S. Case No. 60 of 2025, F.I.R. dated 26.03.2025 registered for the offences punishable under Sections 126(2), 115(2), 109(1), 303(2), 3(5) of the B.N.S., 2023.
3. Allegation against the petitioner is that he along with his father has assaulted the son of the informant due to which he sustained injury.
4. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the petitioners are innocent and they have been falsely implicated in
2/4 the present case. He further submits that it appears from the F.I.R. that due to some petty dispute the present occurrence had taken place. Although there is specific allegation against the petitioner that he along with his father have assaulted the son of the informant and he has received injury. Learned counsel for the petitioner further submits that for the same set of allegation co-accused persons, namely, Balindra Yadav and Gaurav Kumar have been granted the privilege of anticipatory bail by this Court vide order dated 06.08.2025 passed in Cr. Misc. No. 48448 of 2025 and injury report of the injured person suggests that the injury is simple in nature caused by hard and blunt substance.
5. Learned APP for the State has opposed the prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioners and submits that the petitioners carry one more case other than the present one but fairly submits on the basis of paragraph-3 of the bail petition that the petitioner is on bail in the pending matter.
6. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case and the fact that similarly situated co-accused persons have been granted the privilege of anticipatory bail by this Court and injury inflicted upon the injured person is simple in nature, let the petitioners, above named, in the event of their arrest or surrender before the court below within a period of thirty days
3/4 from the date of receipt of the order, be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Judicial Magistrate 1st Class, Jehanabad in connection with Parasbigha P.S. Case No. 60 of 2025, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure/ Section 482(2) of BNSS, 2023 and with other following conditions :-
(1) Petitioners shall co-operate in the trial and shall be properly represented on each and every date fixed by the Court and shall remain physically present as directed by the Court and on their absence on two consecutive dates without sufficient reason, their bail bonds shall be cancelled by the Court below.
(2) If the petitioners tamper with the evidence or the witness, in that case, the prosecution will be at liberty to move for cancellation of bail.
(3) And, further condition that the court below shall verify the criminal antecedent of the petitioners and in case at any stage, it is found that the petitioners have concealed their criminal antecedents, the court below shall take step for cancellation of bail bond of the petitioners. However, the
4/4 acceptance of bail bonds in terms of the above-mentioned order shall not be delayed for purpose of or in the name of verification.
(Rajesh Kumar Verma, J) Ibrar//- U