Mishri Lal Yadav v. State Of Bihar And ANR
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Criminal Miscellaneous No.3274 of 2018 Arising Out of P.S.Case No. -692 Year- 2016 Thana -COMPLAINT CASE District- SUPAUL ====================================================== Mishri Lal Yadav S/o Chhedi Prasad Yadav, R/o Mohalla- Teacher Colony, Triveniganj, P.S.- Triveniganj, District- Supaul. .... .... Petitioner
Versus
1. The State of Bihar.
2. Satya Narayan Chaudhary S/o Late Kari Chaudhari, R/o VillageGauravgarh, Ward No.4, Supaul, P.S.+ District- Supaul. .... .... Opposite Parties ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner : Mr. Pramod Mishra, Advocate For the Opposite Parties : Smt. Anita Kumari Singh, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY KUMAR ORAL ORDER 05-02-2018 Heard.
The petitioner apprehends arrest in connection with Complaint Case No.692C of 2016 registered for an offence under Sections 420 and 120B of the IPC.
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is retired teacher having clean antecedent. The similarly situated co-accused Gopal Kumar Jha has been allowed anticipatory bail by a coordinate Bench of this Court in Cr.Misc.No.49980 of 2017 and so the petitioner also deserves the same privilege.
4. The learned APP opposed the submissions.
5. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances, the prayer for anticipatory bail is allowed. Let the above named
Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.3274 of 2018 (2) dt.05-02-2018 2/2 petitioner in the event of his arrest or surrender before the court below within six weeks from today be released on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of CJM, Supaul in connection with Complaint Case No.692C of 2016 subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Cr.P.C. with following conditions:- (i) One of the bailors of the petitioner shall be a local person having sufficient immovable property within the jurisdiction of the concerned Court.
(ii) The petitioner will not induce any witness or tamper with the evidence.
(iii) The petitioner shall cooperate in the disposal of trial and make themselves available as and when required by the court and on the event of failure on his part to appear before the court below on two consecutive dates without showing any genuine reasons, the prosecution is free to move for cancellation of his bail.
(Sanjay Kumar, J) B.Kr./- U T