Rabindra Nath Mishra v. The State Of Bihar And ORS
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Miscellaneous Jurisdiction Case No.4663 of 2014 IN Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No. 19099 of 2012 =========================================================== Rabindra Nath Mishra Son of Narmadeshwar Mishra Resident of Village - Bela, Post Office - Aurangabad, Police Station - Aurangabad Muffsil, District - Aurangabad .... .... Petitioner
Versus
1. The State of Bihar through Mr. Rajesh Gupta, Principal Secretary, Department of Co-operative, Government of Bihar, New Secretariat, Patna - 800001
2. Mr. Hukum Singh Meena, Registrar, Co-operative Societies, Bihar, Patna, New Secretariat, Patna-800001
3. Mr. Indiwar Pathak, Managing Director, District Central Co-operative Bank, Aurangabad
4. Mr. Sanjay Kumar Singh, Chairman
5. Mr. Suresh Kumar Singh, Vice-Chairman
6. Mr. Mahendra Prasad Singh, Director
7. Mr. Ram Bachan Bhagar, Director
8. Sri Ganesh Shankar Vidyarthi, Director
9. Sri Abhiram Prasad, Director
10. Sri Ravindra Kumar Sinha, Director
11. Sri Rajeev Kumar Vidyarthi, Director
12. Sri Ram Suchit Ram, Director
13. Sri Lalan Ravidas, Director
14. Smt. Chanrama Wati Devi, Director
15. Smt. Nitu Kumar, Director
16. Sri Indivar Patha, Ex-Officio Manager (Opposite Party No. 4 to 15 are Members) of Board of Directors, District Central Co-Operative Bank, Aurangabad .... .... Respondents =========================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : MR. SHAILENDRA KUMAR, ADV. For the Respondent/s : Mr. KUMARI AMRITA, ADV. =========================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE CHAKRADHARI SHARAN SINGH ORAL JUDGMENT Date: 22-07-2015 In my opinion, the order of this Court dated 16.01.2014 stands substantially complied with in view of the supplementary show cause reply filed on behalf of the opposite party no. 2, bringing on
Patna High Court MJC No.4663 of 2014 dt.22-07-2015 2/2 record the decision of the Board of Directors of Aurangabad District Central Co-operative Bank Limited, Aurangabad dated 20.07.2015. The Court expects that the decision granting promotion to the petitioner specifying the post to which he has been promoted in view of the said decision of the Board of Directors shall be communicated to him within a period of two weeks from the date of receipt/production of a copy of this order, if not already communicated.
It goes without saying that the petitioner shall have liberty to raise his claim before the appropriate authority for grant of consequential benefits, arising out of said decision dated 20.07.2015. This applications stands disposed of with the observation, as above.
(Chakradhari Sharan Singh, J.) Vats/- U