← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./25258/2018bail granted

Yasir Ahmad @ Yasir Hashmi v. State Of Bihar And ANR

2018-04-25Mr. Justice Sudhir Singh2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.25258 of 2018 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -799 Year- 2016 Thana -BHABHU(KAIMUR) COMPLAIN C DistrictBHABHUA (KAIMUR) ====================================================== Yasir Ahmad @ Yasir Hashmi, son of Badaruddin Hasmi, Resident of Village - Kachhawa, P.S. Kachhawa, District - Mirzapur (U.P.). .... .... Petitioner

Versus

1. The State of Bihar.

2. Shamshad Begam, W/o Yasir, D/o Basir Ahmad, R/o Village Kachhawan, P.S. Kachhawan, District - Mirzapur, at present R/o Vill - Hata, P.S. - Chainpur, District - Kaimur at Bhabua. .... .... Opposite Parties ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner : Mr. Rajani Kant Pandey, Advocate. For the State : Smt. Nirmala Kumari, A.P.P. ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUDHIR SINGH ORAL ORDER 25-04-2018 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P. for the State.

The petitioner is apprehending his arrest in a case for the offence registered under Sections 498(A), 406 and 323 of the IPC.

The prosecution story, in brief, is that the accused persons including the petitioner tortured the victim due to nonfulfilment of demand of dowry. It has been submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that the petitioner has got no criminal antecedent. There is no allegation of tampering with the witnesses alleged against the

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.25258 of 2018 (2) dt.25-04-2018 2/2 petitioner. The petitioner has falsely been implicated in the present case due to petty family dispute. The case is triable by the Magistrate. The petitioner has further relied upon the judgment of this Court in the case of Md. Naimul Haque Ansari @ Naimul Haque Ansari & Ors. Vs. The State of Bihar, reported in 2006(3) PLJR 182.

On behalf of the learned counsel for the State, it has been submitted that the petitioner is named in the F.I.R/ complaint case.

Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances, let the petitioner above named, in the event of arrest or surrender before the learned court below within a period of six weeks from today, be released on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.10,000/- (Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned A.C.J.M.-Ist, Kaimur at Bhabua, in connection with Complaint Case No. 799 of 2016, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure.

U.K./- (Sudhir Singh, J) U T