Ranjit Singh @ Ranjit Kumar v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.27734 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-657 Year-2024 Thana- COMPLAINT CASE - PATNA CITY District- Patna ====================================================== 1.
Ranjit Singh @ Ranjit Kumar S/o Bacchu Singh Resident of VillageKhanpur, Narma, P.S.-Fatuha, District-Patna. Present R/o Amawati, New Year Kali Mandir, P.S.-Chutiya, District-Ranchi (Jharkhand). 2.
Sima Devi W/O Ranjit Singh (Second Wife) Resident of Village-Khanpur, Narma, P.S.-Fatuha, District-Patna. Present R/o Amawati, New Year Kali Mandir, P.S.-Chutiya, District-Ranchi (Jharkhand). ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
1.
The State of Bihar BIHAR 2.
Saroj Devi W/O Sri Ranjit Singh Resident of Village-Khanpur, Narma, P.O.- Mohiuddinnagar, P.S.-Fatuha, District-Patna.Naihar Address- Goraur, P.S.- Chabilapur, Nalanda ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr.Nagendra Kumar For the Opposite Party/s :
Mr.Abhay Kumar ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ALOK KUMAR PANDEY ORAL ORDER 23-07-2025 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners, the opposite party no.2 and the State.
2. Petitioners apprehend arrest in connection with Complaint Case No. 657 of 2024 for the offences under Sections 498(A), 494, 420, 406, 34 of the Indian Penal Code.
3. Learned counsel appearing for the parties have submitted that now they are ready to settle the dispute.
4. Without going into the merits of the matter, petitioners are granted provisional anticipatory bail for a period of six months from the date of receipt/production of a copy of this
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.27734 of 2025(3) dt.23-07-2025 2/2 order in the event or surrender before the learned trial court on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Addl. Chief Judicial Magistrate I, Patna City in connection with Complaint Case No. 657 of 2024.
5. The concerned Court is directed to make suitable efforts for the purpose of conciliation between the parties.
6. The petitioners and the opposite party no. 2 would have the opportunity to work out an amicable resolution of the issue.
7. If an amicable resolution is worked out within six months, petitioners would be entitled to confirmation of their provisional anticipatory bail.
8. If, on the other hand, the issue is not resolved between the parties, the learned trial court, needless to say, would be well within its jurisdiction to exercise its judicial discretion and pass appropriate orders, which may include cancellation of the petitioners' provisional bail.
9. With the aforesaid observation, this petition stands disposed of.
(Alok Kumar Pandey, J) mcverma/- U T