Bhola Singh v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.30196 of 2024 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-651 Year-2023 Thana- Excise P.S. District- Vaishali ====================================================== 1.
Bhola Singh SON OF FUDENI SINGH RESIDENT OF VILLAGEKHILWAT, WARD NO -07, P.S - BIDUPUR , DISTT- VAISHALI 2.
Ajit Kumar, S/O LATE LAKHANDEV SINGH RESIDENT OF VILLAGEKHILWAT, WARD NO -07, P.S - BIDUPUR , DISTT- VAISHALI ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr. Ravish Mishra For the Opposite Party/s :
Mr. Bishweshwar Ram ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE CHANDRA PRAKASH SINGH ORAL ORDER 23-04-2024 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State.
2. The petitioners are apprehending their arrest in connection with Hajipur Excise P.S. Case No. 651 of 2023, for the offences punishable under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act.
3. As per prosecution case, total 513 litres of illicit Indian made foreign liquor was recovered from the hut located behind the house of the petitioners.
4. Learned counsel for the petitioners has submitted that the petitioners are innocent and have falsely been implicated in this case. The petitioners have no criminal
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.30196 of 2024(2) dt.23-04-2024 2/3 antecedent as stated in para 3 of the bail petition. Local people disclosed the name of the petitioners due to previous enmity. The alleged recovery is made from the open place which is accessible to anyone. Nothing has been recovered from the conscious possession of the petitioners, hence no case is made out against the petitioners. Learned counsel has relied on the judgment of Full Bench of Hon'ble Patna High Court in the case of Ram Vinay Yadav vs. State of Bihar reported in 2019 (2) PLJR 1089. The Full Bench in the case of Ram Vinay Yadav (supra) has held that an application for anticipatory bail in a case arising out of Bihar Excise and Prohibition Act can be maintained, despite the bar under Section 76(2) of the Act, if on the basis of allegation made in the FIR, no offence under the said provision is made out.
5. Learned APP for the State has vehemently opposed the prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioners by submitting that the bar of Section 76(2) of the Act applies in this case.
6. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case as well as the nature of allegation against the petitioners, let the above named petitioners, in the event of their arrest/surrender within a period of six weeks from today, be enlarged on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail-bond of Rs.
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.30196 of 2024(2) dt.23-04-2024 3/3 20,000/- (Rupees Twenty Thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned court concerned, Vaishali at Hajipur in connection with Hajipur Excise P.S. Case No. 651 of 2023, subject to conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure.
7. The application stands allowed.
(Chandra Prakash Singh, J) Ranjeet/- U T