Patna High CourtCWJC/4622/1998dfd for non appearance

B.N.Bhawnani v. The Bihar State Elec.Board Andor

2018-10-26Mr. Justice Vikash Jain2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.4622 of 1998 ====================================================== B.N.Bhawnani, Golden Ice Fruit Company, son of Late Newand Ram, resident of North S.K. Puri, P.S.- Shri Krishnapur, Town and DistrictPatna. .... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The Bihar State Electricity Board, appearing through its Chairman, Bailey Road, P.s. Kotwali Town and District- Patna.

2. The Chief Engineer, com. And Revenue, Bihar State Electricity Board, Bailey Road, P.S. Kotwali, Town and District- Patna.

3. The Electrical Executive Engineer, Dakbunglow Electric Supply Division, Budh Marg, P.S.- Kotwali, Town and District- Patna.

4. The Assistant Electrical Engineer (Rev.), Dakbunglow Electric Supply Division, Budh Marg, P.s. Kotwali, Town and District- Patna.

5. The Assistant Electrical Engineer (S), Dakbunglow Electric Supply Sub Division, Mauryalok Complex, P.S. Kotwali, Town and District- Patna. .... .... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : None For the Respondent/s : Mr.

====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VIKASH JAIN ORAL ORDER 26-10-2018 Despite repeated calls, no one appears on behalf of the petitioner.

2. Shri Vinay Kirti Singh, learned senior counsel appearing on behalf of the respondent- Power Holding Company submits that the prayer in the writ petition for restraining the respondents from disconnection of the electric supply and charging of any delayed payment of surcharge/interest clearly appears to have become infructuous in view of the order of this Court dated 22.07.1998.

Patna High Court CWJC No.4622 of 1998 (8) dt.26-10-2018 2/2

3. Be that as it may, the writ petition is dismissed for non-prosecution by the petitioner.

(Vikash Jain, J) N.H./- U