Pappu Singh @ Pappu Kumar Singh v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL APPEAL (SJ) No.1554 of 2019 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-136 Year-2018 Thana- BIDUPUR District- Vaishali ====================================================== PAPPU SINGH @ PAPPU KUMAR SINGH, Son of Ashok Singh Resident of Village - Khilwat, Police Station - Bidupur, District- Vaishali. ... ... Appellant/s
Versus
THE STATE OF BIHAR ... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Appellant/s :
Mr. Rajeev Ranjan For the Respondent/s :
Mr. Binay Krishna ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE BIRENDRA KUMAR ORAL JUDGMENT Date : 04-06-2019 Heard learned counsel for the parties.
This is an appeal under Section 14-A(2) of the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989 (hereinafter referred to as the "SC/ST Act") against the refusal of prayer for regular bail vide order dated 19.03.2019 in Bidupur P.S. Case No. 136 of 2018 passed by the learned 1st Additional Sessions Judge-cum-Special Judge S.C./S.T. (POA) Act, Vaishali at Hajipur in connection with the aforesaid case registered under Sections 363, 364, 365 of the Indian Penal Code as well as Sections 3(1)(w)(i) of the SC/ST Act.
Wife of the informant allegedly fled away along with co-accused Ravi Kumar Singh and this appellant. Ravi Kumar Singh has already been allowed bail by a
Patna High Court CR. APP (SJ) No.1554 of 2019 dt.04-06-2019 2/2 Coordinate Bench of this Court vide order dated 07.03.2019 passed in Cr. Appeal (SJ) No. 685 of 2019.
Considering the aforesaid fact, let the appellant, above named, be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.20,000/- (Rupees Twenty Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Court below where the case is pending in connection with the aforesaid case, subject to the condition that the appellant shall fully cooperate with the investigation/trial of the case, failing which the court below shall be at liberty to cancel the bail bond of the appellant as well as condition that both the bailors shall be resident of the territorial jurisdiction of the learned court below.
Accordingly, the impugned order is set aside and this appeal stands allowed.
(Birendra Kumar, J) Kundan/- AFR/NAFR N.A.
CAV DATE N.A.
Uploading Date 07.06.2019 Transmission Date 07.06.2019