Mohit Kumar Yadav @ Mohit Kumar v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.28308 of 2022 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-66 Year-2021 Thana- DARBHANGA SADAR DistrictDarbhanga ====================================================== MOHIT KUMAR YADAV @ MOHIT KUMAR Son of Kailash Yadav Resident of Village - Kharthua Bijuli, P.s.- Sadar, Distt.- Darbhanga. ... ... Petitioner
Versus
The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr.Baidya Nath Prasad, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :
Mr.Sunil Kumar Pandey, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUDHIR SINGH ORAL ORDER 01-11-2022 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.
Learned counsel for the petitioner is directed to remove the defects, as pointed out by the Office, within a period of four weeks.
The petitioner is apprehending his arrest in a case registered under Sections 366(A) and 504 of the Indian Penal Code.
The prosecution allegation, in short, is that the accused person abducted the minor daughter of the informant for the purpose of marriage.
It has been submitted on behalf of the petitioner that the petitioner has got no criminal antecedent. There is no
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.28308 of 2022(2) dt.01-11-2022 2/2 allegation of tampering of witnesses alleged against the petitioner. The petitioner has falsely been implicated in the present case. On recovery, the statement of the victim has been recorded under Section 164 Cr.P.C. in which she has denied the allegation made in the F.I.R.. The victim has admitted that she got married with the petitioner out of her own will. On behalf of the State, it is submitted that the petitioner is named in the F.I.R.
Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances, let the petitioner, above named, in the event of arrest/surrender before the learned court below within a period of twelve weeks from today, be released on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.10,000/- (Ten thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Darbhanga in connection with Sadar P.S. Case No. 66 of 2021, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure.
(Sudhir Singh, J) Pankaj/- U T