Rajesh Yadav v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.28213 of 2026 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-11 Year-2026 Thana- SINDHUGAR District- Gaya ====================================================== Rajesh Yadav, S/o Sukhdeo Yadav, R/o Village - Kowaykhurd, P.S - Sindhugarh, District - Gaya ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Praveen Kumar, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Madhura Nand Jha, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK KUMAR PANDEY ORAL ORDER 04-05-2026 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

2. The petitioner has prayed for regular bail in a case registered for the offence punishable under Sections 191(2), 191(3), 190, 126(2), 115(2), 118(2), 117(2), 109, 303(2), 74, 352, 351(2) and 351(3) of B.N.S.

3. The case of the prosecution, in short is that while there was some matrimonial dispute between son of the informant and his wife, the petitioner along with others arrived there and it is alleged that the petitioner has assaulted with iron rod on the head of the informant's son due to which he has received grievous injury.

4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is innocent and has committed no offence. He has been falsely implicated in this case. Learned counsel for the petitioner

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.28213 of 2026(2) dt.04-05-2026 2/2 has submitted that the petitioner and the informant both are of same family. It has further been submitted that as the son of the informant was assaulting brutally his wife, the petitioner along with others has gone there to rescue and the occurrence has taken place. It has further been submitted that from perusal of the F.I.R. it will transpire that the occurrence is of 22.01.2026 whereas the F.I.R. was lodged on 26.01.2026. There is delay of 4 days and the delay is not explained. It has further been submitted that there is no repetition of the blow. Petitioner is having no criminal antecedent and he is languishing in judicial custody since 06.02.2026.

5. Learned APP appearing for the State has vehemently opposed the prayer of regular bail.

6. Having heard learned counsel for the parties and considering the facts and circumstances of the case, this court is inclined to enlarge the petitioner on bail. The above named petitioner is directed to be released on bail in connection with Sindhugarh P.S. Case No. 11 of 2026 on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned A.C.J.M., Sherghati, Gaya Jee. (Ashok Kumar Pandey, J) lata/- U T