← Library
Patna High CourtCR. WJC/884/2024disposed

Churamani Devi v. The State Of Bihar Through The Principal Secretary, Dept. Of Home, Govt. Of Bihar, Patna

2025-05-01Mr. Justice Sandeep Kumar2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Writ Jurisdiction Case No.884 of 2024 Arising Out of PS. Case No.- Year-0 Thana- District- Munger ====================================================== Churamani Devi Wife Of Late Mathura Sharma Resident Of Village - Samho, Police Station - Samho, District - Begusarai, State - Bihar ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

The State Of Bihar Through The Principal Secretary, Dept. Of Home, Govt. Of Bihar, Patna Bihar 2.

The Director General Of Police, Bihar Bihar 3.

The Inspector General, Bhagalpur Bihar 4.

The Deputy Inspector General, Munger Bihar 5.

The District Magistrate-Cum-Collector, Munger Bihar 6.

The Superintendent Of Police, Munger Bihar 7.

The Sub-Divisional Magistrate, Sadar Munger Bihar 8.

The Sub-Divisional Police Officer, Sadar, Munger Bihar 9.

The Station House Officer, Jamalpur, Munger Bihar 10.

Nikesh Singh Son Of Late Suresh Singh Resident Of Village - Rampur, P.S. - Jamalpur, District - Munger 11.

Vikash Kumar Son Of Late Suresh Singh Resident Of Village - Rampur, P.S. - Jamalpur, District - Munger ... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Manoj Kumar Singh For the Respondent/s :

Mr. Ramadhar Singh, G.P.25 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANDEEP KUMAR ORAL ORDER 01-05-2025 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State.

2. The petitioner has approached this Court for commanding the respondent authorities to protect the life property and liberty of the petitioner by the private respondent and their associates and the petitioner further prays for other consequential relief or reliefs for which she is entitled under the

Patna High Court CR. WJC No.884 of 2024(2) dt.01-05-2025 2/2 law.

3. The petitioner claims to be a widow and submits that she is being harassed by her own relatives and they are trying to capture her land.

4. Petitioner is permitted to approach the Superintendent of Police, Munger with her representation and the Superintendent of Police, Munger will examine the allegations levelled by the petitioner and will take all necessary steps permissible in law for the redressal of the grievance of the petitioner.

5. With the aforesaid observation and direction, this writ application stands disposed of.

6. It is made clear that the Court has not applied its mind to the facts of the case.

7. Let a copy of the order be communicated to the Superintendent of Police, Munger, forthwith through FAX for its compliance.

(Sandeep Kumar, J) shikha/- U T