Patna High CourtCR. MISC./28807/2025bail rejected

Raja Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

2025-08-06Mr. Justice Satyavrat Verma2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.28807 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-203 Year-2023 Thana- UJIYARPUR District- Samastipur ====================================================== 1.

Raja Kumar S/o Umesh Das R/o village - Chandchaur Ramnagar , Police Station - Ujiyarpur , District - Samastipur 2.

Vikash Kumar @ Birbal S/o Vijay Das R/o village - Chandchaur Ramnagar , Police Station - Ujiyarpur , District - Samastipur ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Mahendra Pratap For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Chandra Bhushan Prasad- A.P.P.

====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SATYAVRAT VERMA ORAL ORDER 06-08-2025

1. Heard the learned Advocate for the petitioners and the learned APP for the State.

2. The petitioners seek bail in connection with Sessions Trial No.760 of 2023 arising out of Ujiyarpur P. S. Case No.203 of 2023 instituted for the offences under Sections 376, 302 and 201 of the Indian Penal Code, but the charge has been framed under Sections 302 and 201 of the I.P.C.

3. The learned counsel for the petitioners submits that petitioners are persons with clean antecedent and petitioner no.1 is in custody since 23.11.2023 and petitioner no.2 is in custody since 30.03.2024 and allegation is of rape and murder of the daughter of the informant.

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.28807 of 2025(3) dt.06-08-2025 2/2

4. The learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioners submits that petitioners are not named in the FIR and suspicion in the FIR is raised against Nitish Kumar and the name of the petitioners transpired in the confessional statement of Nitish which which does not have any evidentiary value.

5. The learned A.P.P. Sri Chandra Bhushan Prasad submits that trial has commenced and out of seven prosecution witnesses, six prosecution witnesses have been examined and only doctor remains to be examined, as such, the trial is on verge of conclusion. It is also submitted that the allegation alleged in the FIR is heinous.

6. Considering the submissions made by the learned A.P.P., the Court is not inclined to release the petitioners on bail.

7. The prayer of the petitioner for bail stands rejected. (Satyavrat Verma, J) vikash/- U T