Rahul Kumar v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.37856 of 2021 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-258 Year-2020 Thana- BEUR District- Patna ====================================================== RAHUL KUMAR S/o Satyendra Singh R/o- Sipara Dasharatha, P.S.- Beur, Distt.- Patna ... ... Petitioner
Versus
The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr.Subodh Kumar, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :
Mr.A.G.
====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRABHAT KUMAR SINGH ORAL ORDER 23-09-2021 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State. The petitioner prays for grant of regular bail in a case registered for the offence punishable under section and other ancillary sections of the Indian Penal Code.
As per the prosecution case, this petitioner along with coaccused Ravi Kumar was apprehended by the police with stolen motorcycle.
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has been apprehended only on suspicion and no case of theft has been lodged with respect to motorcycle in question. Similarly situated co-accused Ravi Kumar has already been allowed bail by a co-ordinate bench of this Court vide order dated 16.7.2021, passed in Cr.Misc.No. 18037/2021. Petitioner is in custody since 11.10.2020. Investigation is
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.37856 of 2021(2) dt.23-09-2021 2/2 complete.
Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, let the petitioner, mentioned above, be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/-(ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate III, Patna in Beur Police Station Case No. 258 of 2020 on the following conditions:-
(1) Petitioner shall co-operate in the trial and shall be properly represented on each and every date fixed by the Court and shall remain physically present as directed by the Court and on his/her absence on two consecutive dates without sufficient reason, his/her bail bond shall be cancelled by the Court below.
(2) If the petitioner tampers with the evidence or the witnesses, in that case, the prosecution will be at liberty to move for cancellation of bail.
(Prabhat Kumar Singh, J) Shashi U T