Md Intiyaz v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.27535 of 2026 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-9 Year-2026 Thana- Vasudevpur District- Munger ====================================================== 1.
Md Intiyaz S/o Reyaz @ Gholta @ Md. Riyaz R/o Mohalla - Nayagaon, Kansar, P.S. - Basudeopur, Dist. - Munger.
2.
Md. Reyaz @ Gholta @ Md. Riyaz S/o Md. Ekram R/o Mohalla - Nayagaon, Kansar, P.S. - Basudeopur, Dist. - Munger. ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr.Surya Narayan Sah, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :
Mr.Narsingh Tanti, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PARTHA SARTHY ORAL ORDER 29-04-2026
1. Heard learned counsel for the parties.
2. At the outset, it is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioners that petitioner no.2 Md. Reyaz @ Gholta @ Md. Riyaz having been arrested during pendency of the instant application, he is not pressing the application so far as petitioner no.2 is concerned.
3. In view of the above, the application so far as petition no.2 Md. Reyaz @ Gholta @ Md. Riyaz is concerned, stands dismissed as not pressed.
4. The petitioner no.1 in this application prays for grant of anticipatory bail apprehending his arrest in connection with Vasudevpur P.S. Case no. 9 of 2026 registered for the offence punishable under section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, 2016.
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.27535 of 2026(2) dt.29-04-2026 2/2
5. As per the prosecution case, on a search being conducted, 5 litres of liquor was recovered from the house of the petitioners.
6. Learned counsel for the petitioner no.1 submits that the petitioner has been falsely implicated in the case because of his antecedent. No incriminating article has been recovered from his possession or from his house. He undertakes to cooperate in the investigation/trial.
7. The application for bail is opposed by learned APP for the State.
8. Having heard learned counsel for the parties and taking into consideration the allegation against the petitioner no.1 in the F.I.R., it is directed that the petitioner no.1 above named, in the event of his arrest or surrender before the learned Court below within a period of four weeks, be released on anticipatory bail in connection with Vasudevpur P.S. Case no. 9 of 2026 on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Exclusive Special Judge, Excise-II, Munger.
Bibhash/- (Partha Sarthy, J) U T