← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./27588/2018bail granted

Manoj Sapera v. State Of Bihar And ANR

2018-05-04Mr. Justice Sudhir Singh2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.27588 of 2018 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -1239 Year- 2016 Thana -NALANDA COMPLAINT CASE DistrictNALANDA (BIHARSHARIFF) ====================================================== Manoj Sapera, son of Late Baleshwar Sapera, resident of village Raitar, Police Station - Giriyak, District Nalanda.

.... .... Petitioner

Versus

1. The State of Bihar.

2. Anju Devi wife of Manoj Sapera resident of village Raitar, Police Station - Giriyak, District Nalanda.

.... .... Opposite Parties ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner : Mr. Anil Kumar Singh, Advocate. For the State : Mr. Manish Kumar 2, A.P.P. ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUDHIR SINGH ORAL ORDER 04-05-2018 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P. for the State.

The petitioner is apprehending his arrest in a case for the offence registered under Sections 323, 341, 504, 379, 498(A), 307 of the IPC and 3⁄4 of the D. P. Act in which cognizance has been taken under Sections 498(A) and 323 of the IPC. The prosecution story, in brief, is that the accused persons including the petitioner tortured the victim due to nonfulfilment of demand of dowry. It has been submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that the petitioner has got no criminal antecedent. There

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.27588 of 2018 (2) dt.04-05-2018 2/2 is no allegation of tampering with the witnesses alleged against the petitioner. The petitioner has falsely been implicated in the present case due to petty family dispute. The case is triable by the Magistrate. The petitioner has further relied upon the judgment of this Court in the case of Md. Naimul Haque Ansari @ Naimul Haque Ansari & Ors. Vs. The State of Bihar, reported in 2006(3) PLJR 182.

On behalf of the learned counsel for the State, it has been submitted that the petitioner is named in the F.I.R/ complaint case.

Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances, let the petitioner above named, in the event of arrest or surrender before the learned court below within a period of six weeks from today, be released on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.10,000/- (Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate-VI, Nalanda at Biharsharif, in connection with Complaint Case No.1239C of 2016, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure.

U.K./- (Sudhir Singh, J) U T