← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./28647/2022bail granted

Dhrub Narayan Chaturvedi v. The State Of Bihar

2022-11-15Mr. Justice Satyavrat Verma2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.28647 of 2022 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-31 Year-2022 Thana- BARH District- Patna ====================================================== DHRUB NARAYAN CHATURVEDI S/o Late Suresh Chaturvedi @ Late Pandit Suresh R/o Mohalla- Talimpur, P.S.- Barh, District- Patna ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Sanjay Kumar @ S. K., Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Raj Kishore Singh, A.P.P.

====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SATYAVRAT VERMA ORAL ORDER 15-11-2022 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P. for the State.

Let the defect(s), if any, be removed within a period of four weeks.

The petitioner apprehends his arrest in a case registered for the offences punishable under Sections 341, 323, 420, 504 and 506 of the Indian Penal Code.

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner has antecedent of one case.

The informant alleges that petitioner along with other accused persons assaulted him and made him sign some document and threatened to leave the house. It is alleged that the house is the ancestral property in the name of the mother of the informant in which all the four brothers have share. Further, the petitioner only gave Rs.1,90,000/- when he had agreed to pay

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.28647 of 2022(2) dt.15-11-2022 2/2 Rs.8 lakhs for purchasing the share of the informant. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner has been falsely implicated in the present case. It is further submitted that petitioner is own brother of the informant and there is dispute relating to property as would be manifest from the allegation as alleged in the FIR itself. Learned A.P.P. for the State opposes the prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioner.

Considering the submissions made by the learned counsel for the petitioner, the petitioner above-named, in the event of his arrest or surrender before the learned Court below within a period of six weeks from today, be released on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned court below where the case is pending/successor court in connection with Barh P.S. Case No. 31 of 2022, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438 (2) of the Cr.P.C.

(Satyavrat Verma, J) Kundan/- U T