Madan Singh And ORS v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.50564 of 2017 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-58 Year-2010 Thana- DERNI BAZAR District- Saran ====================================================== 1.

Madan Singh Son of Late Dharmendra Singh, 2.

Tuna Singh @ Tuntun Kishore Singh Son of Late Harendra Singh, 3.

Anil Singh @ Anil Kumar Singh, Son of Late Nand Kishore Singh, 4.

Devanti Devi Wife of Late Nand Kishore Singh, All are resident of VillagePurdilpur, P.S.- Derni, District- Saran. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State Of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Ravi Prakash, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Chandra Bhushan Prasad, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SATYAVRAT VERMA ORAL ORDER 29-11-2023

1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned APP for the State.

2. The learned counsel for the petitioners, at the outset, very fairly submits that charges have been framed, trial has commenced and witnesses are being examined.

3. The learned APP for the State, Mr. Chandra Bhushan Prasad, thus, submits that since charges have been framed and trial has commenced, as such, the Court should not interfere in the trial at this stage.

4. Considering the submissions made by the learned APP for the State, the Court is not inclined to entertain the quashing application.

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.50564 of 2017(2) dt.29-11-2023 2/2

5. Accordingly, the present quashing application stands rejected.

(Satyavrat Verma, J) Rishabh/- U T