Patna High CourtCR. MISC./24222/2020bail rejected

Kishore Sahu @ Kishore Kumar Sahu v. The State Of Bihar

2020-10-06Mr. Justice Prabhat Kumar Singh2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.24222 of 2020 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-219 Year-2020 Thana- TURKAULIYA District- East Champaran ====================================================== 1.

KISHORE SAHU @ KISHORE KUMAR SAHU Son of Late Prayag Sahu Resident of Village- Raghunathpur, Dwarikapuri, Ward No. 9, P.S.- Turkauliya, (Raghunathpur O.P.), District- East Champaran, Motihari. 2.

Vishal Kumar Son of Kishore Sahu Resident of Village- Raghunathpur, Dwarikapuri, Ward No. 9, P.S.- Turkauliya, (Raghunathpur O.P.), DistrictEast Champaran, Motihari. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Radha Mohan Singh For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.A.G ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRABHAT KUMAR SINGH ORAL ORDER 06-10-2020 This matter is taken up for consideration through Video Conferencing under the orders of Hon'ble the Chief Justice.

Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned A.P.P for the State.

The petitioners seek bail in Turkauliya (Raghunathpur O.P.) P.S. Case No. 219 of 2020, registered for the offence punishable under Sections 188, 269, 270, 447, 341, 323, 324, 326(A), 307, 504 and 34 of the Indian Penal Code and section 3 of the Epidemic Disease Act and section 51 of the Disaster Management Act.

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.24222 of 2020(3) dt.06-10-2020 2/2 As per the prosecution case, on 15.04.2020 at 7 'O' clock, all the accused persons including these petitioners variously armed came at the door of informant and started abusing him. Petitioner no. 1 is alleged to have assaulted by Dabia which caused injury on his palm. Thereafter, all the accused persons including petitioner no. 2 threw acid on the informant causing injury on his back.

It is submitted on behalf of the petitioners that petitioners have falsely been implicated in this case. There is general and omnibus allegation. Petitioners are in custody since 16.04.2020 having no criminal antecedent.

Considering the facts aforesaid and the nature of allegation, I am not inclined to enlarge the petitioners abovenamed on bail. Accordingly, the same is rejected. (Prabhat Kumar Singh, J) vinita/- U T