Patna High CourtCWJC/3646/1996withdrawn

Mahanth Ramashraya Das v. State Of Bihar And ORS

2015-07-09Mr. Justice Ramesh Kumar Datta2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.3646 of 1996 ====================================================== Mahanth Ramashraya Das, disciple of Late Mahanth Sita Ram Das, Mahanth Chauburji Ram Kota, Ayodhyaji, at & P.O. Narainpur, P.S. Kuchaikote, District Gopalganj .... .... Petitioner

Versus

1. The State of Bihar

2. The Collector, Gopalganj

3. Additional Collector, Gopalganj

4. S.D.O., Gopalganj

5. Deputy Collector Land Reforms, Gopalganj

6. Circle Officer, Kuchaikote Block, at & P.O. & P.S. Kuchaikote, District Gopalganj

7. Mukur Ram, son of Puran Harijan

8. Saudagar Manjhi, son of Late Chand Manjhi

9. Bhagirathi Gond, son of Gokul Gond

10. Kashi Dusadh, son of Ganga Dusadh

11. Hira Lal Ram, son of Tulsi Ram

12. Chhote Lal Ram, son of Tulsi Ram

13. Rangilal Ram, son of Thag Ram

14. The Bhudan Yagna Committee, Gopalganj through its Chairman

15. The Chairman, Bhudan Yagna Committee, Gopalganj .... .... Respondents ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Y.V.Giri, Sr. Advoate with Mr. Vikash Ratan Bharti, Advocate For the State (R. 1-6) : Ms. Nivedita Nirvikar, G.A. 10 For Respondents 7 -13 : Mr. Udit Nr.Singh & Mr. Rajiv Kumar, Advocates ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAMESH KUMAR DATTA ORAL ORDER 09-07-2015 Mr. Y.V.Giri, learned Sr.Counsel for the petitioner appearing along with Mr.Vikash Ratan Bharti, Advocate on Record, seeks permission to withdraw the writ application with liberty to approach the Civil Court against the orders of confirmation passed under the Bihar Bhoodan Yagna Act, 1954 by the Revenue Officer with the prayer that the interim order passed

Patna High Court CWJC No.3646 of 1996 (15) dt.09-07-2015 by this Court on 8.7.1998 directing the respondents not to dispossess the petitioner from the land in dispute, if not yet dispossessed, until further orders, be continued till order of the Civil Court on application for interim relief. Learned counsels for the respondents have no objection. The writ application is, accordingly, dismissed as withdrawn with the aforesaid liberty.

It is directed that the interim order passed on 8.7.1998, which was continued by order dated 12.4.1999, shall remain in operation provided the suit/suits is/are filed in the Civil Court within a period of two months from today along with an application for appropriate interim relief until the said application is first considered by the Civil Court.

(Ramesh Kumar Datta, J) spal/- U