Munarik Bhuiyan v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.26800 of 2019 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-32 Year-2019 Thana- AMAS District- Gaya ====================================================== MUNARIK BHUIYAN Son of Dharam Bhuiyan, Resident of VillageKormathu, P.S.- Amas, District- Gaya ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr.Prithivi Raj Singh For the Opposite Party/s :
Mr.Md. Fahimuddin ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SHIVAJI PANDEY ORAL ORDER 24-04-2019 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State.
In this case, the petitioner is seeking anticipatory bail in connection with Amas P.S. Case No. 32 of 2019 registered for offence punishable under sections 272, 273 of the Indian Penal Code and 30 (a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, 2016. It has been alleged that ten litres of mahua liquor has been recovered from the house of petitioner. The petitioner has no criminal antecedent as has been mentioned in paragraph 3 of this application.
Looking to the quantity of liquor and the petitioner having no criminal antecedent, the prayer for bail of the petitioner is allowed and he, in the event of arrest or surrender before the court below within six weeks from today, is directed
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.26800 of 2019(2) dt.24-04-2019 2/2 to be enlarged on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.10,000/- with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Special Judge, Excise, Gaya in connection with Amas P.S. Case No. 32 of 2019, subject to the conditions as laid down under section 438 Cr. PC and also subject to the condition that one of the bailors of the petitioner shall be a local person having sufficient immovable property within the jurisdiction of the concerned Court. The petitioner will not induce any witness or tamper with the evidence. The petitioner shall cooperate in the disposal of trial and make himself available as and when required by the court. If the petitioner is found involved in similar type of allegation in future, the prosecution will have liberty to file an application for cancellation of his bail bond. (Shivaji Pandey, J) mkchy/- U T