Gautam Kumar v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.33161 of 2024 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-67 Year-2023 Thana- KOTHI District- Gaya ====================================================== Gautam Kumar Son of Harendra Prasad @ Harendra Paswan VillageBarakala PS- Kothi Dist- Gaya ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr.Pramod Kumar Singh, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :
Mr.Anand Kishore Choudhary, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RUDRA PRAKASH MISHRA ORAL ORDER 29-04-2024 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.
2. The petitioner seeks bail in Kothi P.S. case No. 67 of 2023 instituted for the offences under Section 392 of the Indian Penal Code.
3. Prosecution allegation, in short, is that when the informant was coming on his motorcycle and reached near bridge of Barakala Road, three unknown persons intercepted him and snatched Rs. 1,64,000/- and a mobile from him.
4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is innocent and has falsely been implicated in
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.33161 of 2024(2) dt.29-04-2024 2/3 the present case. The petitioner is not named in the F.I.R. The name of the petitioner has transpired on the basis of confessional statement of co-accused Kamta Kumar which has no evidentiary value. It is alleged that Rs. 38,000/- has been recovered from the petitioner for which the petitioner states that the same belongs to him. The petitioner has not been put on Test Identification Parade to ascertain his participation in the alleged occurrence. The petitioner has no concern with the said recovered motorcycle. Chargesheet has been submitted in this case. The petitioner is in custody since 24.06.2023 and has two criminal antecedents in which he is on bail. Co-accused has been granted bail by this Bench vide order dated 21.02.2024 passed in Cr. Misc. No. 10345 of 2024.
5. Learned A.P.P. for the State has vehemently opposed the prayer for grant of bail to the petitioner.
6. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case, the period of custody undergone by the petitioner and the claim based on parity, this Court is inclined to grant bail to the petitioner.
7. Let the petitioner be released on bail on
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.33161 of 2024(2) dt.29-04-2024 3/3 furnishing bail bonds of Rs.10,000/- (Ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Court below/concerned Court in connection with Kothi P.S. case No. 67 of 2023 subject to the following conditions: (I) One of the bailors shall be own/close member of the family of the petitioner.
(II) The petitioner shall appear on each and every date fixed at the trial. In case of default in such appearance on two consecutive dates, the Trial Court will have liberty to cancel the bail bonds of the petitioner.
(Rudra Prakash Mishra, J) Pankaj/- U T