← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./28624/2023dismissed

Bhusan Paswan @ Chandra Bhusan Kumar @Bhusan Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

2023-10-03Mr. Justice Anjani Kumar Sharan2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.28624 of 2023 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-69 Year-2019 Thana- RAJAPAKAR District- Vaishali ====================================================== Bhusan Paswan @ Chandra Bhusan Kumar @BHUSAN Kumar Son Of Baleshwar Paswan @ Valeshwar Paswan Resident Of Village- Kathauliya, PsBidupur, Distt- Vaishali ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Ranjit Kumar Thakur For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Murli Dhar ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANJANI KUMAR SHARAN ORAL ORDER 03-10-2023 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State.

2. The petitioner is apprehending his arrest in a case registered for the offence punishable under Sections 395, 397 of the Indian Penal Code.

3. Petitioner along with other accused persons are said to have took Rs. 1,59,000/- including Aadhar Card, PAN card, voter I Card, Bike Owner Book, D.L. key of motorcycle, mobile set etc. and fled away towards Jandaha.

4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is innocent and has been falsely implicated in this case. He submits that the petitioner has been made accused in this case on the basis of confessional statement of co-accused. He submits that there is no specific overt act against the

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.28624 of 2023(4) dt.03-10-2023 2/2 petitioner. He further submits that petitioner has three criminal antecedent of similar nature as stated in para-3 of the bail application.

5. Learned APP for the State opposes the prayer for bail.

6. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case and the fact that petitioner has three criminal antecedent of similar nature, I am not inclined to enlarge the petitioner on bail. Accordingly, his prayer for anticipatory bail is rejected in connection with Rajapakar P.S. Case No. 69 of 2019. (Anjani Kumar Sharan, J) devendra/- U T