Bhusan Paswan @Chandra Bhusan Kumar @Bhusan Kumar v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.28722 of 2023 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-103 Year-2019 Thana- BIDUPUR District- Vaishali ====================================================== Bhusan Paswan @Chandra Bhusan Kumar @Bhusan Kumar Son Of Baleshwar Paswan @ Valeshwar Paswan Resident Of Village- Kathauliya PsBidupur, Distt- Vaishali ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr. Ranjit Kumar Thakur, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :
Mr. Mritunjay Kumar Nirala, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANJANI KUMAR SHARAN ORAL ORDER 28-08-2023 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P. for the State.
2. The petitioner apprehends his arrest in Bidupur P.S. Case No. 103 of 2019 registered for the offences punishable under Sections 379, 356, 392 of the Indian Penal Code pending in the Court of learned J.M. 1st Class, Vaishali at Hajipur.
3. As per prosecution case, on 09.03.2019, informant after collecting money from Mahila Samooh was going to Chechar, one motorcycle rider dashed him and he fell on the ground and the bike riders snatched his bag containing Rs.2,25,000/- and two mobile phones.
4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is innocent and has falsely been implicated in this
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.28722 of 2023(3) dt.28-08-2023 2/2 case. He further submits that petitioner is not named in the FIR. During investigation, one co-accused person was apprehended by the police and in his confessional statement, petitioner is made accused in the present case. Petitioner has three criminal antecedents of similar as stated in para 3 of the bail application.
5. Learned APP for the State vehemently opposed the bail petition and submitted that the petitioner has three criminal antecedents of similar nature.
6. Considering the facts and circumstances of case, nature of offence as well as the fact that petitioner has got three criminal antecedents of similar nature, I am not inclined to enlarge the petitioner on anticipatory bail. The prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioner is hereby rejected. (Anjani Kumar Sharan, J) saurabhkrsinha/- U T