Noor Tara Khatun v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.9563 of 2023 ====================================================== 1.

Noor Tara Khatun Wife of Md. Alauddin Resident of Village- Sangrampur Raimal, P.S.- Sangrampur, District- Gopalganj. 2.

Khusbun Nisha Wife of Md. Islam Ansari R/o- Village- Duhauna, P.S.- Katya, District- Gopalganj.

3.

Seema Kumari Wife of Subash Singh R/o - Village- Sarsar, P.S.- Siwan, District- Siwan.

4.

Nasreen Parween Wife of Yasin Alam Resident of Village- Koriya, P.SGopalganj, District.- Gopalganj. 5.

Md. Shamshad Alam Son of Md. Nizamuddin R/o Village- Kodra Hata, P.S.- Chainpur, District- Gopalganj.

6.

Vedanti Devi Wife of Prabhunath Pandey Resident of Neuri, P.S.- Kateya, District- Gopalganj.

7.

Shanti Devi D/O Rampati Ravidas Resident of Village- Kodra Hata, P.S.- Chainpur, District- Gopalganj.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

The State of Bihar Through the Principal Secretary, Panchayati Raj Department, Government of Bihar, Patna.

2.

The Principal Secretary, Education Department, Government of Bihar, Patna.

3.

The Director, Primary Education, Education Department, Government of Bihar, Patna.

4.

The District Education Officer, Gopalganj.

5.

The District Magistrate, Gopalganj.

6.

The District Programme Officer, Establishment, Gopalganj. 7.

The Block Development Officer, Gopalganj.

8.

The Block Education Officer, x 9.

The Panchayat Secretary Cum Member Secretary, Panchayat Niyojan Samiti, Gram Panchayat Raj.

... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

None.

For the Respondent/s :

Mr. Subhash Chandra Mishra ( SC 16 ).

====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE A. ABHISHEK REDDY ORAL ORDER 14-11-2025 Even today when the matter is called out, there is

Patna High Court CWJC No.9563 of 2023(4) dt.14-11-2025 2/2 no representation on behalf of the petitioners.

2. The matter was earlier listed on 12.05.2025 and 22.08.2025 on which date there was also no representation on behalf of the petitioners.

3. It appears that the petitioners are not interested in prosecuting the present writ petition.

4. The present writ petition, accordingly, dismissed for non-prosecution.

(A. Abhishek Reddy, J) shakir/- U