Ramesh Ram @ Ramesh Kumar And ORS v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.50043 of 2017 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -89 Year- 2016 Thana -HATHAURI District- MUZAFFARPUR ======================================================

1. Ramesh Ram @ Ramesh Kumar, S/o Shankar Ram,

2. Pankaj Kumar Ram @ Pankaj Ram S/o Shankar Ram,

3. Veena Devi W/o Pankaj Ram,

4. Shankar Ram S/o Rudal Ram, All are R/o Village- Sahila Araji, P.S.- Hathauri, District- Muzaffarpur.

.... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Shashi Bhushan Singh For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Dr. Ajeet Kumar ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY PRIYA ORAL ORDER 21-11-2017 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and the State. The petitioners apprehend arrest in Hathauri P.S. Case No. 89 of 2016 instituted for the offence under Sections-302, 201/34 of the Indian Penal Code.

It has been submitted that petitioners are brothers-in-law, Gotani and father-in-law of the deceased.

In the written report, there is specific allegation of making demand of dowry against husband of the deceased, namely, Pappu Ram. There is general and omnibus allegation against these petitioners. In such circumstances, prayer for anticipatory bail is allowed and it is ordered that the petitioners named above in the event of their arrest or surrender in the court below within six weeks from the date of receipt/production of copy of this order, shall be released on

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.50043 of 2017 (3) dt.21-11-2017 2/2 bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each in connection with in Hathauri P.S. Case No. 89 of 2016 corresponding to Sessions Trial No. 66 of 2017 to the satisfaction of learned Sub Judge-X, Muzaffarpur subject to condition as laid down u/S 438(2) of the Cr.P.C. with further conditions (1) bailors should be local having sufficient immovable property within the jurisdiction of the court concerned, (2) petitioners shall cooperate in the trial and shall be present on each and every date fixed by the court and absence on two consecutive dates without proper and reasonable reason, will automatically cancel bail bond of the petitioners and (3) if petitioners tamper with the evidence or the witnesses of the case, in that case, prosecution will be at liberty to move for cancellation of bail of the petitioners. (Sanjay Priya, J) A.K.V./- U T