← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./23165/2018bail granted

Ravi Kumar @ Ravi Rai v. The State Of Bihar

2018-04-26Mr. Justice Dinesh Kumar Singh2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.23165 of 2018 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -24 Year- 2018 Thana -HAJIPUR SADAR DistrictVAISHALI(HAJIPUR) ======================================================

1. RAVI KUMAR @ RAVI RAI S/o Makhan Rai, R/o Vill.- Chak Sakra, P.S.- Sadar, District- Vaishali.

.... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr.

For the Opposite Party/s : Mr.

====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE DINESH KUMAR SINGH ORAL ORDER 26-04-2018 Heard learned counsels for the parties.

The petitioner is apprehending arrest in a case registered for the offences punishable under Section 379 of the IPC. The prosecution case as per the written report submitted by Kalicharan on 11.01.2018 before Officer-in-charge of Sadar Police Station, is to the effect that on 10.01.2018, the informant after loading tiles from Patna Ganesh Ceramic on a Bolero Pickup van, proceeded towards Darbhanga for its delivery. It has further been stated that at around 11.00 P.M. on 10.01.2018, the informant parked his van on the flanks of the road and began to urinate, suddenly three persons stepped in his vehicle and flee away with his vehicle. The FIR was then lodged against unknown persons. During the course of investigation one Vikas Kumar was arrested.

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.23165 of 2018 (2) dt.26-04-2018 2/2 The petitioner's name sprang up after arrest of co-accused Vikas Kumar from whose possession, stolen marble has been recovered. It is submitted that Vikas is on friendly terms with the Lalan Rai, who is the Uncle of this petitioner and who is on inimical terms with this petitioner and hence, the petitioner has been named by Vikas Kumar.

It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that nothing has been recovered from the possession of the petitioner. Considering the facts aforesaid and the accusation of the petitioner on the confessional statement of accused, that no recovery has been made from the petitioners till date, let the petitioner above named be released on anticipatory bail in the event of arrest or surrender before the learned Court below within a period of twelve weeks on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (Ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Vaishali in connection with Vaishali Sadar P.S. Case No.24 of 2018 dated 11.01.2018, G.R.158/18, subject to conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure. (Dinesh Kumar Singh, J) Sanjeev/- U T