Chandan Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.28127 of 2022 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-3 Year-2021 Thana- UDWANTNAGAR District- Bhojpur ====================================================== CHANDAN KUMAR S/O MUKESH SINGH R/o village- Karisath, P.S.- Udwant Nagar (Gajrajganj O.P.), District- Bhojpur ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Dhirendra Singh, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Atul Chandra, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV ROY ORAL ORDER 06-09-2022 Heard counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State Let the defect(s), if any, as pointed out by the office be removed within four weeks.

The petitioner is in judicial custody in connection with Udwant Nagar P.S. Case No. 03 of 2021 for the offences under Section 394 of the Indian Penal Code.

The informant in the F.I.R has stated that in connection with the death of his brother-in-law who was an army man, he had come to the place for completion of paper work and when he was moving on a motorcycle with a neighbor as a pillion rider, two motorcycles intercepted them and snatched their mobile and purse. As he protested, one of them opened fire causing injury on his leg, the accused persons

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.28127 of 2022(2) dt.06-09-2022 2/2 thereafter fled away. He has further complained that beside the mobile, Rs. 2500/- in cash as also ATM Card which were in purse was taken away by the accused person.

The name of the petitioner has come in the confessional statement on the co-accused and considering the fact that he has criminal antecedent of the same nature inasmuch as six cases registered against him, this Court for the present is not inclined to grant him the privilege of bail. If however, he so wants can renew his prayer for bail after framing of charge. With the aforesaid observations, the bail application of the petitioner is rejected.

(Rajiv Roy, J) Jagdish/NehaU T