Md. Taufique Alam @ Taufique Alam And ANR v. State Of Bihar And ANR

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.21921 of 2018 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -612 Year- 2016 Thana -AURANGABAD COMPLAINT CASE District- AURANGABAD ======================================================

1. Md. Taufique Alam @ Taufique Alam, S/o Late Abdul Rashid,

2. Babi W/o Md. Taufique Alam @ Taufique Alam, Both are R/o Vill./Mohalla- Shekh Farukhi Old G.T. Road, Aurangabad, P.S.+Distt.- Aurangabad.

Permanent AddressMohallaBaradori, P.O.+P.S.+Distt.- Sasaram, Rohtas , Bihar.

.... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar.

2. Kamal Kishore Gupta S/o Late Ramdeo Prasad, R/o Mohalla- Shahpur, P.O. & P.S. & Distt.- Aurangabad.

.... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Shailesh Kumar Singh For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Sri Anuj Kumar Srivastava ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY KUMAR ORAL ORDER 26-04-2018 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned A.P.P. for the State.

Petitioners apprehend arrest in connection with Aurangabad Complaint Case No.612 of 2016 registered for the offences under Sections 467, 468, 406, 420, 323, 120(B) of the Indian Penal Code and Section 138 of N.I. Act. The allegation as per the complaint is that all the accused persons named in the F.I.R. took an amount of Rs.14 lacs from the complainant to purchase a house. After few months, on demand, accused Tanveer Alam gave two cheques for an amount of Rs.2 lacs and when the cheques were presented in the Bank, it

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.21921 of 2018 (2) dt.26-04-2018 bounced. The learned counsel for the petitioners submits that these petitioners are wife and husband and they have no concern with the amount taken by the other accused. The allegation of giving cheques is against other accused. The allegation against these petitioners is omnibus.

The learned A.P.P. for the State opposed the submission. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, the prayer for anticipatory bail is allowed and the above named petitioners, in the event of arrest or surrender before the learned court below within six weeks from today, are directed to be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.10,000/- (ten thousand) each with two sureties of the likewise amount each to the satisfaction of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Aurangabad in connection with Aurangabad Complaint Case No.612 of 2016 subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of Cr.P.C.

(Sanjay Kumar, J) Harish/- U