Md. Aliraj v. The State Of Bihar And ORS

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.4207 of 2015 ======================================================

1. Md. Aliraj, Son of Late Abdul Gani, resident of village- Makkhachak Bakhari, Ward No. 5, P.O.- Bakhari Bazar, P.S.- Bakhari Bazar, DistrictBegusarai. .... .... Petitioner

Versus

1. The State of Bihar through the Chief Secretary, Government of Bihar, Patna.

2. The Principal Secretary, Land Reforms Department, Government of Bihar, Patna.

3. The District Magistrate, Begusarai.

4. The Sub- Divisional Development officer, Bakhari, Begusarai.

5. The Superintendent of Police, Begusarai.

6. The Circle Officer, Bakhari, Begusarai.

.... .... Respondents ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Kamal Kishore Singh For the Respondent/s : Mr. P.K. Verma, AAG-5 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE THE ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE and HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE CHAKRADHARI SHARAN SINGH ORAL ORDER (Per: HONOURABLE THE ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE ) 30-01-2016 Heard Mr. Kamal Kishore Singh, learned counsel for the petitioner, and Mr. P.K.Verma, learned Additional Advocate General No. 5, appearing for the State-respondents. The grievance of the writ petitioner, made in this writ petition, under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, in the nature of Public Interest Litigation, relates to encroachment of public path/public road.

Having regard to the facts pleaded in this writ petition, the materials on record and, having heard learned counsel for both

Patna High Court CWJC No.4207 of 2015 (2) dt.30-01-2016 the parties, we find that the subject matter of this writ petition is fully covered by the observations made, and the directions given by us in the order, dated 24.11.2015, passed in C.W.J.C.No. 4309 of 2015 (Sanjay Jha Vs. The State of Bihar and Others), reported in 2016 (1) PLJR 248.

In view of the above and in the interest of justice, it is hereby directed that respondent No.3, namely, District Magistrate, Begusarai and respondent No.4, namely, Sub-Divisional Development Officer, Bakhari, Begusarai, shall act, in the present matter, in accordance with law, keeping in view the observations made and the directions given in the order, dated 24.11.2015, aforementioned.

In view of the above, this writ petition is accordingly disposed of.

(I.A. Ansari, ACJ) (Chakradhari Sharan Singh, J) A.I./- U