Patna High CourtCR. MISC./29231/2018rejected

Sanandi Roy @ Salandi Roy @ Shandi Roy v. The State Of Bihar

2018-05-14Mr. Justice Rajendra Kumar Mishra2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.29231 of 2018 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -44 Year- 2017 Thana -SAHPUR District- PATNA ======================================================

1. SANANDI ROY @ SALANDI ROY @ SHANDI ROY, S/o Late Ram Eqbal Roy, R/o Shankarpur, P.S.- Shahpur, District- Patna. .... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Dineshwar Mishra For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Sri Ram Bilash Roy Raman ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJENDRA KUMAR MISHRA ORAL ORDER 14-05-2018 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned A.P.P. for the State.

The petitioner seeks pre-arrest bail in connection with Shahpur P.S. Case No.44 of 2017 registered for the offences under Sections 341, 323, 324, 307, 379/34 of I.P.C. Accusation is that when in the morning of 10.03.2017 the informant, Deonath Rai had opened his grocery shop Sanadi Roy, this petitioner came to his shop and purchased rope and when the informant asked for money from him he did not pay rather the petitioner encircled the rope in his neck and tightened it and thrashed him on the ground as a result of which he sustained grievous injury and in course of that other co-accused persons assaulted the informant with lathi, danda and took out

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.29231 of 2018 (2) dt.14-05-2018 2/2 Rs.2,00,000/- from his cash box.

Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioners submits that, in fact, one day before occurrence of mar pit had taken place between the petitioner and the informant in which the petitioner's side sustained injuries regarding which wife of the petitioner lodged a Complaint Case No.247(C) of 2017 against the informant and his family members on 9.3.2017. Having considered the facts and the circumstances of the case, and nature of injury I am not inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner. Accordingly, prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioner is rejected.

However, the petitioner is directed to surrender before the court below and pray for regular bail which shall be considered on its own merit without being prejudiced by this order. (Rajendra Kumar Mishra, J) AnilKrSinha/- U