Patna High CourtCWJC/7226/2015withdrawn

Vijay Bahadur Thakur v. The State Of Bihar And ORS

2016-02-02The Chief Justice,Mr. Justice Samarendra Pratap Singh2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.7226 of 2015 ======================================================

1. Vijay Bahadur Thakur S/o Late Baharan Thakur, R/o Village- MohallaTula Chhapar, P.S.- Gopalpur, Dist.- Gopalganj .... .... Petitioner

Versus

1. The State of Bihar through the Chief Secretary, Old Secretariat, Patna

2. The Principle Secretary, Department of Education, Govt. of Bihar, Patna

3. The Director, Secondary Education, Bihar, Patna

4. The District Magistrate, Gopalganj

5. The S.D.M., Gopalganj

6. The District Education Officer, Gopalganj

7. The District Programme Officer (Education), Gopalganj

8. The Block Education Officer, Kuchaikot, Gopalganj

9. The Circle Officer, Kuchaikot, Gopalganj .... .... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Harendra Prasad For the Respondent/s : Mr. Roy Shivajee Nath, AAG-3 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE THE ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE and HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SAMARENDRA PRATAP SINGH ORAL ORDER (Per: HONOURABLE THE ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE ) 02-02-2016 Heard Mr. Harendra Prasad, learned counsel for the petitioner, and Mr. Roy Shivajee Nath, learned Additional Advocate General No. 3, appearing for the State respondents. After some arguments, learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission to withdraw this application with liberty to the petitioner to approach this Court with appropriate application, in future, if so advised, and/or to take recourse to such provisions of law as may be permissible.

To the submissions so made, no objection has been

Patna High Court CWJC No.7226 of 2015 (2) dt.02-02-2016 raised on behalf of the respondents.

In view of the above and in the interest of justice, this application is hereby disposed of as withdrawn with liberty granted to the petitioner to approach this Court with appropriate application, in future, if so advised, and/or to take recourse to such provisions of law as may be permissible. (I.A. Ansari, ACJ) (Samarendra Pratap Singh, J) A.I./- U