Dakshin Bihar Gramin Bank v. Ravi Ranjan

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Letters Patent Appeal No.380 of 2024 In Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.1380 of 2020 ====================================================== 1.

Dakshin Bihar Gramin Bank having its head office at Sri Vishnu Commercial Complex NH-30 New by pass near B.P. Highway Service Petrol Pump Asochak, Patna 800030, through its Chairman. 2.

Chairman, Dakshin Bihar Gramin Bank having its head office at Sri Vishnu Commercial Complex NH-30 New by pass near B.P. Highway Service Petrol Pump Asochak, Patna 800030.

3.

The General Manager, (D.A.C.), Head Office, Dakshin Bihar Gramin Bank at Sri Vishnu Commercial Complex NH-30 New by pass near B.P. Highway Service Petrol Pump Asochak, Patna 800030.

... ... Appellant/s

Versus

Ravi Ranjan Son of Sri Maheswari Garaine Resident of Mohalla- Alkapuri Colony, Bhagwanpur Chowk, P.S.- Bhagwanpur, District- Muzaffarpur PIN842001. ... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Appellant/s :

Mr. Ranjeet Kumar Pandey, Adv For the Respondent/s :

Mr. Kumar Kaushik, Adv ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE THE ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE and HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ALOK KUMAR SINHA ORAL ORDER (Per: HONOURABLE THE ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE) 17-09-2025 The appellants have assailed the impugned order dated 01.02.2024 passed in CWJC No. 1380 of 2020.

2. Learned counsel for the appellants submitted that the learned Single Judge has allowed the writ petition on the score that Respondent (Ravi Ranjan) has not been provided certain documents which are part and parcel of the inquiry proceedings. However, those materials have not been placed on

Patna High Court L.P.A No.380 of 2024(9) dt.17-09-2025 2/2 record in the CWJC. Arising out of this issue, appellants have filed the present LPA.

3. We are of the opinion that if certain materials already exist on the record, if the same is not placed in the file while deciding writ petition, in that event, aggrieved person has a remedy of filing civil review. The appellants have not exhausted the remedy of civil review, therefore, the present LPA is not maintainable and the same is hereby disposed of reserving liberty to the appellants to invoke remedy of civil review. (P. B. Bajanthri, ACJ) ( Alok Kumar Sinha, J) Jyoti/- U