Patna High CourtCWJC/17817/2014dismissed

Upendra Singh v. The State Of Bihar And ORS

2016-01-12Mr. Justice Jyoti Saran2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.17817 of 2014 ====================================================== Upendra Singh son of Ramji Singh resident of village and Post - Baligaon, police station - Ayer, District - Bhojpur.

.... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar.

2. The District Magistrate, Bhojpur.

3. The Block Development Officer cum Chief Executive Officer, Garahani, District - Bhojpur.

4. Sunay Kumar Parmar @ Bablu Singh Father's name not known

5. Ranjit Singh Father's name not known

6. Nagendra Ram Father's name not known

7. Gita Devi Husband's name not known

8. Nilam Devi Husband's name not known

9. Asha Devi Husband's name not known

10. Kiran Devi Husband's name not known

11. Poonam Devi Husband's name not known

12. Dhan Sundari Pandit Father's name not known

13. Ali Imam Father's name not known

14. Ranjan Singh Father's name not known

15. Sanjit Kumar Singh Father's name not known Respondents no. 4 to 15 members of Panchayat Samiti Garhani, through Block Development Officer cum Executive Officer, Garhani, Post- Garhani, Police Station - Charpokhari, District - Bhojpur. .... .... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance:

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Sanjay Kumar, Advocate For the Respondent/s : Mr. Rajiv Kumar Singh, G.P.-2 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE JYOTI SARAN ORAL ORDER 12-01-2016 None appears on behalf of the petitioner.

Counsel for the State is present.

Perused the records.

The petitioner is a member of the Panchayat Samiti Garhani in the district of Bhojpur and is aggrieved by the initiation

Patna High Court CWJC No.17817 of 2014 (2) dt.12-01-2016 of the 'no confidence motion' against the respondent no. 4. Surprisingly, though the requisition and the notice have been questioned by the petitioner as a member but he has not bothered to question the special meeting fixed for 18.10.2014. Neither on locus nor on merit the writ petition is maintainable and which is dismissed accordingly. (Jyoti Saran, J) S.Sb/- U