Geeta Devi v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.28758 of 2022 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-462 Year-2021 Thana- WAJIRGANJ District- Gaya ====================================================== 1.
Geeta Devi W/O Mahes Sharam Resident Of Village- Pipra, P.S.- Wazirganj, District- Gaya.
2.
Santosh Kumar @ Santosh Sharma @ Srikant Sharma S/O Mahesh Sharma Resident Of Village- Pipra, P.S.- Wazirganj, District- Gaya. 3.
Satis Kumar S/O Mahesh Sharma Resident Of Village- Pipra, P.S.- Wazirganj, District- Gaya.
4.
Nitu Kumari D/O Mahesh Sharma Resident Of Village- Pipra, P.S.- Wazirganj, District- Gaya.
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State Of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr.Bindeswari Singh For the Opposite Party/s :
Mr.Nawal Kishore Prasad ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANJANI KUMAR SHARAN ORAL ORDER 07-09-2022 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State.
Learned counsel for the petitioners undertakes to remove the defects within three weeks. In the eventuality of non-removal of defects within undertaken period, the office will place the matter before the Bench.
The petitioners are apprehending their arrest in a case registered for the offence punishable under Sections 341, 323, 354, 379, 504, 34 of the Indian Penal Code.
Petitioners are said to have entered into the house of the informant and started abusing. On protest, all the petitioners assaulted her and snatched her ear ring and golden chain.
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.28758 of 2022(2) dt.07-09-2022 2/2 Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the petitioners are innocent and have been falsely implicated in this case due to land dispute. He submits that occurrence took place on 05.10.2021 but FIR was lodged after delay of 12 days on 17.10.2021. He submits that the injury found upon the victim is simple in nature. He further submits that petitioners have no criminal antecedent as stated in para-3 of this application. Learned APP for the State opposes the prayer for bail.
Considering the facts and circumstances of the case and the fact that there is delay in filing the FIR, let the above named petitioners in the event of their arrest or surrender before the learned Court below within a period of six weeks from today, be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned court below where the case is pending/successor court in connection with Wazirganj P.S. Case No. 462 of 2021, subject to the condition as laid down under Section 438 (2) of the Cr.P.C.
devendra/- (Anjani Kumar Sharan, J) U T