Manmohan Prasad Singh @ Manmohan Singh v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.31525 of 2026 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-421 Year-2025 Thana- SANGRAMPUR District- East Champaran ====================================================== Manmohan Prasad Singh @ Manmohan Singh, Son of Jamadar Prasad @ Jainarayan Singh @ Jaynarayan Singh, R/O Village - Bhawanipur, P.S - Sangrampur, District - East Champaran ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State Of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Ajay Kumar Thakur, Advocate Mr. Purushottam Kumar, Advocate Ms. Kajal, Advocate Mr. Mudit Meet, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Parmanand Prasad, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK KUMAR PANDEY ORAL ORDER 12-05-2026 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

2. The petitioner has prayed for regular bail in a case registered for the offence punishable under Section 105 of the B.N.S.

3. The case of the prosecution, in short, is that the son of the informant has received some injury below the knee and he went to the shop of the petitioner where it is alleged that he administered injection due to which the son of the informant got unconscious. He was rushed to Sangrampur Hospital where doctors declared him dead.

4. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner has submitted that petitioner is innocent and has committed no

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.31525 of 2026(2) dt.12-05-2026 2/2 offence. He has been falsely implicated in this case. Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that the petitioner is a licensed medical shopkeeper and has specifically denied that petitioner has not administered any injection to the deceased. It has further been submitted that from perusal of the postmortem report also it will transpire that the doctor conducting the autopsy of the deceased has only found a wound on his leg and cause of death was reserved till F.S.L. report and the viscera was also preserved. Petitioner is languishing in judicial custody since 24.01.2026.

5. Learned APP appearing for the State has vehemently opposed the application for bail.

6. Having heard learned counsel for the parties and considering the facts and circumstances of the case, this Court is inclined to enlarge the petitioner on bail. The above named petitioner is directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Rs. ten thousand only) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Judicial Magistrate 1st Class, East Champaran at Motihari in connection with Sangrampur P.S. Case No.421 of 2025.

(Ashok Kumar Pandey, J) lata/- U T